Hien Pham vs Alexander Babanine Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pham vs Babanine analysis and find out who is favored!
Hien Pham vs Alexander Babanine Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pham 1 - 0 Babanine
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pham has won 47.64% of points on his second serve, while Babanine has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pham, in recent form, has won 46.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Babanine has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.09% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pham has saved 58.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Babanine has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pham has won 56% of matches played (W/L 14/ 11), with Babanine winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pham has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 19/ 24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 34% (W/L 12/ 23). Babanine has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 18/ 17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 53/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Pham has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11), where as Babanine has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pham winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pham winning 2 and Babanine winning 0. The last match between Pham and Babanine was at the M25 Cairns, 03-10-2022, Q2 round, Hard with Hien Pham getting the victory 7-6(6) 7-6(1).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pham and Babanine have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pham winning 0 times and Babanine 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Pham winning 2, and Babanine 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pham has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Babanine has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pham has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Babanine has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pham has converted 45.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Babanine has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pham 1 - 0 Babanine
Hien Pham
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
Alexander Babanine
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
40% (31-47)
Career Total W/L
50% (73-73)
59% (10-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Hien Pham | Alexander Babanine |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 9 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 2:47:0 | 2:47:0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (59/83) | 66% (51/77) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (44/59) | 76% (39/51) |
2nd Serve Win% | 33% (8/24) | 42% (11/26) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Points W% | 35% (27/77) | 37% (31/83) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) |
Hien Pham
Player
Alexander Babanine
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hien Pham | Alexander Babanine |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (22/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (194/170) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.03 | 0 |
Aces Total | 6 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0 |
DFs Total | 15 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (340/487) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (203/340) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (67/147) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (17/38) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (168/471) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Hien Pham Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Paul Werren
Player
Hien Pham
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Hien Pham
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Hien Pham
Player
Elgin Khoeblal
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Hien Pham
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Hien Pham
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
49
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Hien Pham
Player
Shenglin Zhuo
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Alexander Babanine Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Alexander Babanine
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Alexander Babanine
Player
John Amato
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Hien Pham
Player
Alexander Babanine
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Alexander Babanine
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | w/o | H2H |
view more